Legal Opinion

Spokane County v. Pacific Bridge Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1923PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOURT, J.

The plaintiff, Spokane County, State of Washington, commenced this action against the Pacific Bridge Company, hereinafter referred to as “defendant,” and its surety, the United 'States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, to recover damages in the sum of $61,740, for alleged breaches of a construction contract, whereby defendant undertook and agreed to do all the work and furnish all the materials necessary to construct, improve and complete about thirteen and one-half miles of asphalt macadam pavement upon Permanent Highway No. 12, known as Palouse Permanent Highway, in Spokane County, *553Washington,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State v. EvansOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Archambeau v. EdmunsonOregon Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Bottig v. PolskyOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Williams v. Mount Hood Ry. & Power Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Flannery v. RohrmayerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1879

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Timmins v. HaleOregon Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Strandholm v. General Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1963
  3. American National Bank v. KerleyOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  4. City of Granville v. Kovash, IncorporatedNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Cicrich v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1933

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API