Flannery v. Rohrmayer
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Bill to foreclose a builder’s lien; brought to the City Court of the city of Hartford, and heard before Bennett, J. Facts found and decree passed. Motion in error by respondents. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtCarpenter, J.
This is a bill to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. The services were performed by the petitioner, under contracts with Rohrmayer, in the erection of the foundation and walls of a building on the land of the wife.
The respondents claimed that the work was defectively and improperly done, whereby they sustained damage. On the trial it appeared that a portion of the work was completed and paid for in full without objection, and without any claim that it was not properly done. The court found that the balance of the work was defective to some extent, and assessed the damage at fifteen dollars, which…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Gilman v. DisbrowSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1878
3Cited by18 opinions
- M. H. Walker Realty Co. v. American Surety Co. of New YorkUtah Supreme Court · 1922
- Wadsworth v. HodgeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
- Eastern Sportswear Co. v. S. Augstein & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Spokane County v. Pacific Bridge Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1923
- Huntley v. HoltSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1890
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.