Strandholm v. General Construction Co.
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSloan, J.
Plaintiff, a longshoreman, was injured as a result of the collapse and fall of a large marine boom at a place where plaintiff was then employed. Defendant-appellant, General Construction Company, was not plaintiff’s employer. Prior to the accident defendant had remodeled the boom; installed the boom in its place of use and rerigged the lines and gear necessary for the operation of the boom. Plaintiff claimed that defendant had negligently done so. The jury returned a verdict for defendant. The trial court thereafter sustained plaintiff’s motion for a new trial. Defendant appeals. Other…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Foley v. the Pittsburgh-Des Moines Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Devlin v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Ford Motor v. WagonerTennessee Supreme Court · 1946
- Ryan v. Feeney & Sheehan Building Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1924
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Council of Co-Owners Atlantis Condominium, Inc. v. Whiting-Turner Contracting Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- Wights v. Staff Jennings, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1965
- Price v. Gatlin and Columbia Tractor & Implement Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1965
- Fenton v. AleshireOregon Supreme Court · 1964
- Beglau v. AlbertusOregon Supreme Court · 1975
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.