Legal Opinion

Boger v. Norris & Stevens, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 2, 1991No. A8712-07472, A8802-00894 A61773 (Control), A61774PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

In these consolidated actions, plaintiffs, who were tenants at an apartment complex, of which defendant Norris & Stevens is the managing agent and defendants Day are the resident managers, sought recovery for brain damage and other serious conditions that they allege were caused by concentrations of toxic metals in the hot water heaters and the water provided by defendants. The jury awarded compensatory and punitive damages to plaintiffs. Defendants appeal from the resulting judgments, and we affirm.

In their first three assignments, defendants contend that plaintiffs failed to establish an…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Marshall v. MartinsonOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Wilson v. TobiassenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  4. State v. DickCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  5. Joachim v. Crater Lake Lodge, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Jennings v. Baxter Healthcare Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  2. Dikeman v. Carla Properties, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  3. Jane Doe 130 v. Archdiocese of Portland in OregonDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2010
  4. Georgetown Realty, Inc. v. Home InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  5. State v. VenegasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API