Legal Opinion

State v. Dick

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 18, 1988No. 87CR0126; CA A45227PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraber, J.

Defendant was convicted of possession of a controlled substance (ORS 167.238), felony driving while revoked (ORS 153.623(21)(c)), reckless driving (ORS 153.623(20)), and attempting to elude a police officer (ORS 153.623(24)). He assigns as error the trial court’s denial of his motion in limine to exclude his prior felony conviction for manufacture of a controlled substance. Defendant testified, and his prior conviction was admitted for the purpose of impeachment. We affirm.

Defendant argues that the probative value of his prior conviction was substantially outweighed by its prejudicial effect…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. McClureOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Marshall v. MartinsonOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Smith v. DurantOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Steamboaters v. Winchester Water Control DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. KingOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State v. BernsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  3. State v. MinnieweatherCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  4. Boger v. Norris & Stevens, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  5. State v. ArandaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API