Jane Doe 130 v. Archdiocese of Portland in Oregon
District Court, D. Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
MOSMAN, District Judge.
On April 8, 2010, Magistrate Judge Papak issued Findings and Recommendation (“F & R”) (# 82) in the above-captioned case recommending that I DENY plaintiffs Motion to Compel (#44), DISMISS plaintiffs claim of misrepresentation, DENY AS MOOT defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (# 52) as to Jane’s misrepresentation claim, DENY the remainder of the Motion to Dismiss (# 52), and GRANT IN PART AND DENY IN PART defendants’ Motion for Judicial Notice (# 54). No objections were filed.
DISCUSSION
The magistrate judge makes only recommendations to the court, to which any…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. Jose Francisco Reyna-Tapia, AKA Jose ReynaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- WM.. v. Am. Airlines, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2018
- Butters v. The Travelers Home and Marine Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2023
- Granas v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanyDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2025
- Mark Granas v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanyDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2025
- McMillin v. Walmart Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2024
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.