Legal Opinion

Jennings v. Baxter Healthcare Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 11, 1998No. 9405-03148; CA A92690PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a defense verdict in this products liability action. She alleges that she was exposed to silicone from breast implants that leaked and ruptured, causing her personal injuries. On appeal, plaintiff makes multiple assignments of error. We reverse and remand for a new trial.

In 1978, plaintiff, then age 51, received silicone gel breast implants following bilateral mastectomies. Subsequently, one implant partially deflated and was replaced in 1980. The other implant partially deflated after a mammogram was performed in 1992. In 1993, plaintiff had surgery to remove the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State v. O'KeyOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. LyonsOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Brown v. Boise Cascade Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  5. Cunningham v. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Vassallo v. Baxter Healthcare Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  2. Jennings v. Baxter Healthcare Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Atterbury, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1998
  4. State v. SampsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  5. Kennedy v. Eden Advanced Pest TechnologiesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API