Legal Opinion
Nash Engineering Co. v. City of Norwalk
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 15, 1950PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Sullivan, J.
The following is a summary of the facts stipulated by the parties: The fifth taxing district of the defendant municipality takes in the entire territory of the city. A basic tax is assessed against property within this district to provide revenue for the maintenance of schools and highways. The area of the fourth taxing district is restricted to the city’s more populated sections. Owners of property within it are subjected not only to the above-mentioned basic tax but also to one assessed to meet the expense of police and fire protection, garbage removal, street lighting and sewage disposal.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State Ex Rel. City of Stamford v. Board of Purchase & SuppliesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Kane v. KaneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Donnelly v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
- Modern Home Utilities, Inc. v. GarritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
- Meyers v. ArmSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Weiss v. WiederlightSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Malone v. SteinbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Boucher Agency, Inc. v. ZimmerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- Matthews v. FMC CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Lamb v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.