Legal Opinion
Modern Home Utilities, Inc. v. Garrity
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 30, 1936PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAvery, J.
The plaintiff brought this action to recover a balance of $232.85 claimed by it to be due upon an instalment note of the defendant. The defendant filed an answer admitting all the allegations of the complaint except the amount claimed as due upon the note, and, by way of special defense, set up that the note was given for a beer cooling unit to be installed on the premises, that the plaintiff warranted that the equipment would be fit and proper for the tasks it was to perform and the requirements of the defendant; and that it did not perform the purposes for which it was intended and was so…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kane v. KaneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Stein v. ColemanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1901
- Loveland v. Aymett's Auto Arcade, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
- New Idea Pattern Co. v. WhelanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1903
- Whiting v. KoepkeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1898
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Malone v. SteinbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Lundberg v. KovacsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- L. Albert & Son v. Armstrong Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- Nash Engineering Co. v. City of NorwalkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
- Beech Aircraft Corp. v. Flexible Tubing Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1967
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.