Legal Opinion
Kane v. Kane
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 27, 1935PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAvery, J.
These two cases were tried together. The pleadings are long and involved, and no useful purpose would be served by attempting to state them in detail. One suit was brought by Lillian M. Kane as guardian to recover upon a promissory note signed by the defendant; the other suit was brought by Elizabeth M. Kane (who is the same person as Lillian M. Kane) against the defendant asking for an accounting for cash and securities claimed to have been placed in his hands. After trial, judgment in each case was entered in favor of the defendant and the plaintiff has appealed. No claims of law were made…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Greenthal v. Lincoln, Seyms & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1896
- Stein v. ColemanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1901
- New Idea Pattern Co. v. WhelanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1903
- Whiting v. KoepkeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1898
- Lacon v. DavenportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1844
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Nash Engineering Co. v. City of NorwalkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
- Moore v. SergiConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- Bushnell Plaza Development Corp. v. FazzanoConnecticut Superior Court · 1983
- Modern Home Utilities, Inc. v. GarritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
- Zuch v. Connecticut Bank & Trust Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1985
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.