Legal Opinion

State v. Dana

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 15, 1988No. C4-87-350PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

AMDAHL, Chief Justice.

The main issues on appeal in this prosecution for child sex abuse relate to Minn. Stat. § 595.02, subd. 3 (1986), which is a legislatively-created exception to the hearsay rule for certain out-of-court statements made by children under the age of 10 who are the victims of sexual assaults. The court of appeals ruled, inter alia, that the trial court erred in deciding the issue of the admissibility of testimony regarding the statements on the basis of written summaries of the statements and the representations of the prosecutor relating to the reliability of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. State v. MyersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  3. State v. GardnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  4. State v. BurnsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  5. State v. KasperSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. State v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  2. State v. LanamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  3. State v. KraushaarSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  4. State v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  5. Santiago v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API