Legal Opinion
State v. Kasper
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 31, 1987No. C3-86-1415PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
AMDAHL, Chief Justice.
Defendant Brian James Kasper petitioned for review of a decision of the court of appeals affirming his conviction of criminal sexual conduct in the third degree. We granted the petition not for the purpose of granting defendant the relief he requested but for the limited purpose of expressing our disagreement with the court of appeals’ conclusion that the trial court abused its discretion in not requiring the victim of the Spreigl offense to testify at the Spreigl hearing.
The facts are recounted in detail in the court of appeals’ opinion. State v. Kasper, 405…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. DoughmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- State v. McAdooSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- State v. LindahlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- State v. WakefieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- State v. CasadyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. KennedySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- State v. KilgoreWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. FrisingerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- State v. DanaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.