Clements v. Wright
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtWillson, C. J.
(after stating the case as above).
In submitting issues be thought the pleadings and the evidence made, the trial court propounded 47 questions to the jury. In closing the argument of the case, W. P. McLean, Jr., one of appellees’ attorneys, told the jury that his clients’ case on the question of negligence was “made out and completed in the first six questions,” which, he insisted, should be answered in the affirmative, and that appellant’s contentions were covered by questions 7 to 44, which, he insisted, should be answered in the negative. Appellant objected to the argument, insisting same…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McFaddin v. HebertTexas Supreme Court · 1929
- Lumbermen's Reciprocal Ass'n v. WilmothTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
- Morgan v. MaundersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
- Texas N. O. R. Co. v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
- City of Wichita Falls v. WhitneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Younger Bros., Inc. v. MarinoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
- Tucker Oil Co. v. MatthewsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
- Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. RowellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
- Kasch v. AntonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- Coleman v. WestCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.