Legal Opinion

Lumbermen's Reciprocal Ass'n v. Wilmoth

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided January 23, 1929No. 957—5102PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLeddt, J.

Defendants in error sued to set aside an award of the Industrial Accident Board in the case of G. T. Wilmoth, em-ployé, against it as insurer and Weeks and Bagwell as employers.

That portion of the judgment awarding Drs. Lumpkin and Marsalis $876 is assailed because it includes $442 for medical services rendered the claimant by said physicians after the expiration of the first four weeks following the injury. This objection must be sustained. Rights of parties under the Workmen’s Compensation Act (Rev. St. 1925, arts. 8306-8309) arise from and are measured by the terms embodied in such act.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Western Indemnity Co. v. MacKechnieCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  2. Southwestern Telegraph & Telephone Co. v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  3. Texas N. O. R. Co. v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  4. North v. Atlas Brick Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1926

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Howell v. Texas Workers' Compensation Commission, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2004
  2. Federal Surety Co. v. SmithTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  3. Stinnett v. Paramount-Famous Lasky Corp. of New YorkTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  4. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Hendrick Memorial HospitalTexas Commission of Appeals · 1943
  5. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Hendricks Memorial HospitalTexas Supreme Court · 1943

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API