Legal Opinion

Morgan v. Maunders

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 6, 1930No. 12387PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This suit was instituted by John Maunders and wife, Edith Maunders, against Russell Morgan and the Trinity Portland Cement Company, hereinafter referred to as cement company, to recover damages resulting from injuries received by the wife in a collision occurring at the intersection of Ninth and Grace streets in the city of Wichita Falls. Russell Morgan, as an employee of the cement company, of Dallas, Tex., was driving one of its trucks and traveling north on Grace street, and Mrs. Maunders was traveling west on Ninth street. The plaintiffs alleged that Mrs. Maunders approached and entered…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. HannigTexas Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Bell v. BlackwellTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  3. Houston & Texas Central Railroad v. GrayTexas Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Moore v. IveyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
  5. Parker v. BaileyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Psimenos v. HuntleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  2. Traders & General Ins. Co. v. CrouchCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  3. Commercial Standard Ins. Co. v. McGeeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  4. San Antonio Public Service Co. v. MurrayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  5. Walsh Ex Rel. Walsh v. Table Rock Asphalt Construction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1975

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API