Legal Opinion

Tucker Oil Co. v. Matthews

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 20, 1938No. 13765PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUNKLIN, Chief Justice.

The Tucker Oil Company has appealed from a judgment in favor of W. A. Matthews for the loss of a number of plaintiff’s cattle, which he alleged died from drinking from a stream that was polluted with oil, salt water and basic sediment, which the defendant had negligently permitted to escape during the operation of its oil wells.

In the year 1924, plaintiff leased a tract of 600 acres of land under a parol lease, which was renewed from year to year. Part of the land he used for farming and a part for pasturing his cattle. The land was in the heart of the old Burk Burnett…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Joske v. IrvineTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Sun Oil Co. v. RobicheauxTexas Commission of Appeals · 1930
  3. Texas Pac. Fidelity & Surety Co. v. HallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  4. Ft. Worth & D. C. Ry. Co. v. SpeerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  5. Gordon v. McIntoshCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Landers v. East Texas Salt Water Disposal Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1952
  2. City of Beaumont v. Excavators & Constructors, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1994
  3. City of Austin v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  4. Lujan Ex Rel. Lujan v. Healthsouth Rehabilitation Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Carter v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API