Legal Opinion
Silk v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
District Court, C.D. California
Decided February 20, 2007No. CV04-9782 AHS(SHX)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER: (1) GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(6); AND (2) DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
STOTLER, Chief Judge.
I
PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
On August 8, 2006, defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss Complaint Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) (“Motion to Dismiss”). On August 18, 2006, plaintiff filed a Motion for Summary Judgment. On August 28, 2006, plaintiff filed opposition to defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, which incorporated by reference the papers filed in support of plaintiffs Motion for Summary…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Keenan v. AllanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Amato v. BernardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Monica L. McDowell Elvig v. Calvin Presbyterian Church Will AcklesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, a New York Corporation v. Eileen M. Parker, AKA Eileen Marrero, Anita Pietrofitta Estate of Scott Parker, by and Through Its Personal Representative, and Zachary Dry, a Minor Child by and Through His Natural Mother and Guardian Lisa Dry, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, a New York Corporation v. Eileen M. Parker, AKA Eileen Marrero, Anita Pietrofitta, and Zachary Dry, a Minor Child by and Through His Natural Mother and Guardian Lisa Dry Estate of Scott Parker, by and Through Its Personal RepresentativeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Wilson v. Playtika, Ltd.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2018
- Wilson v. PTT, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2018
- Lamuth v. Hartford Life & Accident InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2014
- Bernardo Sanchez v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2022