Legal Opinion

Bernardo Sanchez v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company

District Court, C.D. California

Decided September 2, 2022No. 2:20-cv-03732Unknown

1Opinion

Case 2:20-cv-03732-JWH-JEM Document 74 Filed 09/02/22 Page 1 of 24 Page ID #:1709 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BERNARDO SANCHEZ, Case No. 2:20-cv-03732-JWH-JEM 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS OF FACT AND 13 v. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW PURSUANT TO RULE 52(a) OF 14 HARTFORD LIFE & ACCIDENT THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL INSURANCE CO.; and PROCEDURE 15 DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case 2:20-cv-03732-JWH-JEM Document 74 Filed 09/02/22 Page 2 of 24 Page ID #:1710 1 I. INTRODUCTION 2 This case concerns…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. James L. Batson, Sr. v. Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  3. Saffon v. Wells Fargo & Co. Long Term Disability PlanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  4. Vicki Jordan v. Northrop Grumman Corporation Welfare Benefit Plan Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  5. Muniz v. Amec Construction Management, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API