Legal Opinion

Powell v. Associated Counsel for Accused

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 14, 2005No. 52614-6-IPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶l — Clint Powell appeals the trial court’s order granting a defense CR 12(b)(6) motion and dismissing his legal malpractice claim against the attorneys who represented him in a criminal matter because he failed to allege and could not prove his innocence after pleading guilty to a crime. Powell pleaded guilty to solicitation to deliver a material in lieu of a controlled substance, in violation of RCW 69.50.401(c). This offense is a gross misdemeanor, for which the maximum term of confinement is one year. But at the sentencing hearing, Powell was erroneously sentenced for a Class C felony to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Reid v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Reid v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Krahn v. KinneyOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Stevens v. BisphamOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Gebhardt v. O'ROURKEMichigan Supreme Court · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Mooney v. FrazierWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Powell v. Associated Counsel for AccusedCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  3. Powell v. Associated Counsel for AccusedCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  4. Piris v. KitchingWashington Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Powell v. Associated CounselCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API