Legal Opinion
Powell v. Associated Counsel for Accused
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided March 6, 2006No. 52614-6-IPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
129 P.3d 831 (2006)
131 Wash.App. 810
Clint L. POWELL, individually, Appellant,
v.
ASSOCIATED COUNSEL FOR the ACCUSED, aka ACA, a Washington State Corporation, Todd M. Gruenhagen and Jane Doe Gruenhagen, husband and wife and the marital community composed thereof, George Eppler and Jane Doe Eppler, husband and wife and the marital community composed thereof, John Doe 1-4, Respondents.
No. 52614-6-I.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.
March 6, 2006.
Larry James Landry, Attorney at Law, Seattle, WA, for Appellant.
Clint L. Powell, Appearing Pro Se.
Christopher Holm Howard, Holland Knight LLP,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Reid v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Reid v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Ang v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- Ang v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- Falkner v. FoshaugCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Simon v. JosephSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2013
- Johnson v. BabcockCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- Piris v. KitchingWashington Supreme Court · 2016
- Jones v. LinkDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2007
- Ray J. Kraklio v. Kent SimmonsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2018
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.