Legal Opinion
Powell v. Associated Counsel for Accused
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided February 14, 2005No. 52614-6-IPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
106 P.3d 271 (2005)
125 Wash.App. 773
Clint L. POWELL, individually, Appellant,
v.
ASSOCIATED COUNSEL FOR the ACCUSED, aka ACA, a Washington State Corporation, Todd M. Gruenhagen and Jane Doe Gruenhagen, husband and wife and the marital community composed thereof, George Eppler and Jane Doe Eppler, husband and wife and the marital community composed thereof, John Doe 1-4, Respondents.
No. 52614-6-I.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.
February 14, 2005.
Larry J. Landry, Attorney at Law, Seattle, WA, for Appellant.
Christopher H. Howard, Holland Knight LLP, Seattle, WA, for Respondents.
KENNEDY,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Reid v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Reid v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Krahn v. KinneyOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Stevens v. BisphamOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Gebhardt v. O'ROURKEMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Mooney v. FrazierWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2010
- Powell v. Associated Counsel for AccusedCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- Piris v. KitchingWashington Supreme Court · 2016
- Powell v. Associated CounselCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- David Skindzelewski v. Joseph Smith, Jr.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2020
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.