Township of Canosia v. Township of Grand Lake
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for St. Louis county for an accounting between plaintiff and defendant townships and to determine the amount of public debt including certain bonded indebtedness of plaintiff township contracted before its division and the part thereof payable by each township.
Read the full summary
Action in the district court for St. Louis county for an accounting between plaintiff and defendant townships and to determine the amount of public debt including certain bonded indebtedness of plaintiff township contracted before its division and the part thereof payable by each township. The case was tried before Moer, J., who made findings of fact, and as conclusion of law found that defendant township of Grand Lake was indebted to plaintiff in the sum of $2,333.24. From a judgment entered pursuant to the findings, said defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.
The plaintiff township of Canosia, the defendant township of Grand Lake, and the defendant township of Dinham comprised a single statutory township in the year 1892, under the name of Canosia. Grand Lake was set off from Canosia in November, 1895, pursuant to the provisions of chapter 227 of the laws of that year. Dinham was also set off, but after the commencement of this action, and prior to the time of the trial, the organization of that town was dissolved by proceedings in district court, and it thereupon again became, and still remains, a part of the plaintiff township. The other…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Commissioners of Currituck County v. Commissioners of Dare CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
- Forest County v. Langlade CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
- Backus v. CoyneMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
- Bonham v. GallowayIllinois Supreme Court · 1851
- Commissioners of Vance County v. Commissioners of Granville CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- American Automobile Insurance v. MollingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Gustafson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- Employers Mutual Casualty Co. v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- Glass v. IDS Financial Services, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1991
- Koenigs v. TravisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.