Legal Opinion

Chellico v. Martire

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 8, 1948No. 84,864PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Application for a peremptory writ of mandamus upon the relation of defendant railway company to compel the district court for Itasca county to change the venue of this action against relator from Itasca county to St. Louis county.

This action, which is one of four suits arising out of a collision between an automobile and one of defendant’s trains near the village of Keewatin, was commenced and is pending in Itasca county against defendant railroad as well as against two individual defendants, who have stipulated that a change of venue may be granted. Two of the other actions were commenced in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ramswick v. MessererSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  2. Vornbrock v. BolligSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  3. Eichten v. Central Minnesota Cooperative Power Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Simon v. CarrollSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  2. Anderson v. Connecticut Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  3. Berry v. North Pine Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  4. State ex rel. Hierl v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  5. King v. SchultzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API