Eichten v. Central Minnesota Cooperative Power Ass'n
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Per curiam
This matter comes before us pursuant to our order to show cause why writs of mandamus should not issue directing the district court of Redwood county, ninth judicial district, and the Honorable Albert H. Enersen, judge thereof, to grant relators’ motion for a change of venue to Hennepin county.
Two negligence actions are involved, both arising out of an automobile collision which occurred in Redwood county on June 11, 1943. Both actions were brought in Hennepin county, but the venue was changed to Redwood county, since both defendants (respondents here) reside there.
What relators seek is to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Scheele v. Union Loan & Finance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- State Ex Rel. Ward v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- State Ex Rel. Kulla v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
3Cited by2 opinions
- King v. SchultzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Chellico v. MartireSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948