Legal Opinion

Ramswick v. Messerer

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 18, 1937No. 31,207PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from an order denying plaintiffs’ combined motion to set aside the verdicts entered in favor of defendant and grant a new trial.

The action arose out of an automobile collision in the city of Minneapolis. One of the plaintiffs, William H. Shackleton, was driving an automobile in which the other plaintiffs were riding when it collided with the automobile of defendant. Actions were started against Messerer by separate summons and complaints by each of the plaintiffs and were placed on the calendar together. The day the cases were called the attorney for plaintiffs moved that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Harrigan v. GilchristWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Azinger v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  3. Schmidt v. RiessWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
  4. National Union Fire Ins. v. Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1933

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Simon v. CarrollSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  2. Anderson v. Connecticut Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  3. Ferron v. Intermountain Transportation Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1943
  4. State ex rel. Hierl v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  5. Coble v. LaceySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API