Budris v. Consolidation Coal Co.
District Court, E.D. New York
At Law. Three actions by Alexander Budris against the Consolidation Coal Company, together with an action by Saloma Budris against the same defendant, and one by both Alexander and Saloma Budris against such defendant. Hearing on motions by plaintiffs for judgment, as well as on defendant’s special pleas to the jurisdiction and motions to "dismiss.
1Opinion of the Court
CHATFIELD, District Judge.
Motions have been made in the five above-named actions for judgment on behalf of the plaintiff, with costs, and for the impaneling of a jury to assess damages, upon the following grounds <
It is alleged that the defendant served'a plea to the jurisdiction of the court, alleging that the suit was improperly brought in this the Eastern district of New York; that such plea was signed by the defendant’s attorneys, without specifying a special appearance; that the defendant failed to deny the allegations of the complaint, outside of the paragraphs relating to the residence…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lehigh Valley Coal Co. v. YensavageCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914
- Toledo Railways & Light Co. v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Meisukas v. Greenough Red Ash Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Vitkus v. Clyde S. S. Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1916
- Yanuszauckas v. Mallory S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916
3Cited by4 opinions
- Massachusetts Bonding & Ins. Co. v. Concrete Steel Bridge Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1930
- Bacon v. Federal Reserve BankDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1923
- Pine Hill Coal Co. v. GusickiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1919
- Neet v. HolmesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1940