Legal Opinion

Bacon v. Federal Reserve Bank

District Court, E.D. Washington

Decided May 10, 1923No. 4205PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNeterer, District Judge

(after stating the facts as above). Appearances are of two kinds; Special, 'for the purpose of testing the sufficiency of service or the jurisdiction of the court; and general, where the defendant waives defects of service and submits to the jurisdiction. Emphasis is placed upon rule 22 of this circuit, which provides in substance that the special appearances must embody a' statement that, if not sustained, the defendant will.-enter a-general appearance, and unless this agreement is.included the special appearance will be considered a general appearance in -the cause... The purpose of rule 22…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  2. Ex Parte SchollenbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Bank of the United States v. DeveauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1809
  4. Shaw v. Quincy Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892
  5. Southern Pacific Co. v. DentonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Jerry Wayne Davis v. Hill Engineering, Inc. And Williams-Mcwilliams Co., Inc., DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  2. Wilhelm v. Consolidated Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
  3. State Ex Rel. Fatzer v. AndersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1956
  4. Ex Parte CullinanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  5. Brookings State Bank v. Federal Reserve BankDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1923

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API