Legal Opinion

Neet v. Holmes

District Court, S.D. California

Decided May 21, 1940No. 750B, CivilPublished

1Opinion of the Court

BEAUMONT, District Judge.

Motion to re-tax costs. Action brought in the district court was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, this appearing on the face of plaintiffs’ complaint.

A review of cases wherein actions were originally filed in a 'federal court reveals a virtual uniformity of decision to the effect that where a court has no jurisdiction of such cause it has no power to award costs. Smyth v. Asphalt Belt Ry., 267 U.S. 326, 45 S.Ct. 242, 69 L.Ed. 629; Lion Bonding Co. v. Karatz, 262 U.S. 640, 43 S.Ct. 641, 67 L.Ed. 1151; Conley v. Ballinger, 216 U.S. 84, 30 S.Ct. 224, 54 L.Ed. 393;…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Smith v. WhitneySupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Elk v. WilkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Citizens' Bank v. CannonSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. Blacklock v. SmallSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  5. Lion Bonding & Surety Co. v. KaratzSupreme Court of the United States · 1923

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API