Vitkus v. Clyde S. S. Co.
District Court, E.D. New York
At Law. Actions by Frank Vitkus against the Clyde Steamship Company. On motions to set aside service of summons and to dismiss for want of jurisdiction.
1Opinion of the Court
CHATFIELD, District Judge.
In each of the above cases, as in several others decided herewith, motion has been made to this court, prior to the interposition of an answer, for an order setting aside the alleged service of the summons and complaint and dismissing the *289action, upon grounds which will be stated specifically as each, one is taken up for discussion. In each instance the defendant making the motion has appeared “specially” by attorneys for the purpose of making these motions, and in each instance the defendant has intended to avoid a waiver of the right to object to the jurisdiction…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Goldey v. Morning NewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Shaw v. Quincy Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892
- St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. of Texas v. AlexanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Southern Pacific Co. v. DentonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Vidal v. South American Securities Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
- Hurley v. Wells-Newton Nat. CorporationDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1931
- Goade v. VollrathDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1948
- Keller v. American Sales Book Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1936
- Budris v. Consolidation Coal Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1918
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.