Legal Opinion

Meisukas v. Greenough Red Ash Coal Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 21, 1917No. 229PublishedCited by 10 opinions

ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OP NEW YORK. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice White

Alleging himself to be a citizen of New York and a resident in the eastern district, th,e plaintiff in error sued below to recover from the defendant in error the amount of damages alleged to have been by him suffered as the result of an explosion of dynamite while he, the plaintiff, was engaged as a servant of the defendant in working in a coal mine belonging to and operated by it near Shamokin, Pennsylvania. The defendant was alleged to be a corporation created under the laws of the State of Pennsylvania and a resident of that State having its principal place of business at Shamokin. It was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Goldey v. Morning NewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. of Texas v. AlexanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Wabash Western Railway v. BrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1896

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Chipman, Ltd. v. Thomas B. Jeffery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Farmers' & Merchants' Bank v. Federal Reserve BankDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1922
  3. Creager v. P. F. Collier & Son Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1929
  4. Kluver v. Middlewest Grain Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Hurley v. Wells-Newton Nat. CorporationDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1931

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API