Legal Opinion

Hammond v. Bloomfield Hills Building Inspector

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1951No. Calendar 44,988PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBushnell, J.

Plaintiffs John B., Frederick M., and Elizabeth Kean Hammond are the owners of lot 40 (a 5-acre lot) of Hillwood Estates No 1, a subdivision of part of the northeast í of section 14, T 2 N, R 10 E, city of Bloomfield Hills, Oakland county, Michigan. A 3-story house, having upwards of 27 rooms, including 16 bedrooms, is located at about the center of this lot. This house contains approximately 200,000 cubic feet. It was built by plaintiffs’ father in 1923 on 83.6 acres of land.

Plaintiffs purchased the property from the father’s estate, after his death in 1940, for $62,352.93. Subsequent…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Dowsey v. Village of KensingtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  3. Austin v. OlderMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  4. City of North Muskegon v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Long v. City of Highland ParkMichigan Supreme Court · 1950

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Brae Burn, Inc. v. City of Bloomfield HillsMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Kropf v. City of Sterling HeightsMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Osius v. City of St. Clair ShoresMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Bonner v. City of BrightonMichigan Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Bristow v. City of WoodhavenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API