Legal Opinion

Pere Marquette Railway Co. v. Muskegon Township Board

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1941No. Docket No. 57, Calendar No. 41,558PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.

On December 28, 1938, defendant township amended its zoning ordinance, previously adopted June 18, 1937, so as to place a certain triangular parcel of property belonging to plaintiff railway company in class “A” residence district, which, the ordinance restricts to single family dwellings, churches, schools, libraries and private clubs. Class “B” residence district differs from class “A” by permitting the building of two-family dwellings. Class “E” industrial district is limited in general to certain manufacturing and any use not declared a nuisance. Appellant petitioned the township board to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of North Muskegon v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Moreland v. ArmstrongMichigan Supreme Court · 1941

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Christine Building Co. v. City of TroyMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Bonner v. City of BrightonMichigan Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Long v. City of Highland ParkMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Grand Trunk Western Railroad v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Senefsky v. City of Huntington WoodsMichigan Supreme Court · 1943

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API