Board of Education of Springfield Local School District v. Lucas County Budget Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Appellees argue that the BTA is without authority to order the commissioner to modify tax reduction factors. Springfield replies that the court has no jurisdiction to consider this contention because appellees did not specify it in a notice of appeal.
The first question is whether the budget commission has authority to alter a reduction factor. If the commission did not, the BTA had no subject-matter jurisdiction in this case. Subject-matter jurisdiction cannot be waived. Weathersfield Twp. v. Trumbull Cty. Budget Comm. (1994), 69 Ohio St.3d 394, 632 N.E.2d 1281. We can, thus, address this…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State ex rel. Board of Education v. Butler County Budget CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- McNamara v. KinneyOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- Weathersfield Township v. Trumbull County Budget CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1994
3Cited by8 opinions
- Byard v. BylerOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- In re Complaint of Pilkington N. Am., Inc. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2015
- State ex rel. Bond v. Velotta Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2001
- Sheldon Road Associates, L.L.C. v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- In re ByardOhio Supreme Court · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.