Legal Opinion

McNamara v. Kinney

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1982No. 81-1178PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKrupansky, J.

The sole question for this court in reviewing a decision of the BTA is whether that decision was unreasonable or unlawful. See R. C. 5717.04. In the instant action, in order to make this determination we must first ascertain whether, for the purpose of R. C. 319.301, three mills of the five mill levy approved by the Jerusalem Township electorate in November of 1980 constitutes a renewal of an existing tax levy or whether the entire five mills is a totally new and additional tax levy. For the following reasons we conclude this five mill levy is a new and additional levy, and therefore, we…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rogers v. Board of Education of the City School DistrictOhio Court of Appeals · 1923

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Barth v. Hamilton County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Board of Education of Springfield Local School District v. Lucas County Budget CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Springfield Local School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Lucas Cty. Budget Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State Ex Rel. Brady v. BlackwellOhio Court of Appeals · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API