Legal Opinion

In re Complaint of Pilkington N. Am., Inc. (Slip Opinion)

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 24, 2015No. 2013-0709PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFrench, J.

{¶ 1} In the proceedings below, appellant, Pilkington North America, Inc., filed a motion for relief from judgment under Civ.R. 60(B). Pilkington sought relief from an order of appellee, the Public Utilities Commission, issued February 19, 2009, from which Pilkington did not appeal. The commission denied Pilkington’s motion, finding that Pilkington did not meet the requirements of Civ.R. 60(B) and that, in any event, Pilkington was not entitled to relief because it may not use Civ.R. 60(B) as a substitute for appeal.

{¶ 2} Pilkington challenges the commission’s order, raising two propositions…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Ackermann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. City of Arlington v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. Bank of Am., N.A. v. Kuchta (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Office of Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1979

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Fontain v. SandhuOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
  2. In re K.K.Ohio Supreme Court · 2022
  3. In re K.K.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2021
  4. Worthington v. Admr., Bur. of Workers' Comp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2021
  5. In re Determination of Existence of Significantly Excessive Earnings for 2017 Under the Elec. Sec. Plan of Ohio Edison Co. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API