Legal Opinion
East Sacramento Partnerships for a Livable City v. City of Sacramento
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 7, 2016No. C079614PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DUARTE, J.
Real party in interest Encore McKinley Village, LLC (Encore), proposed to construct the McKinley Village Project (the Project), a 328-unit residential development on a 48.75-acre site located in East Sacramento and bounded on the south and east by Union Pacific Railroad tracks and on the north and west by the Capital City Freeway. The City of Sacramento (City) certified the Project’s environmental impact report (EIR) and approved the Project.
East Sacramento Partnerships for a Livable City (ESPLC), a neighborhood group, appeals from denial of its petition for a writ of mandate…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Vineyard Area Citizens for Responsible Growth, Inc. v. City of Rancho CordovaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- DeVita v. County of NapaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Save Our Peninsula Committee v. Monterey County Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- County of Inyo v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Covina Residents for Responsible Dev. v. City of Covina, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Aqualliance v. U.S. Bureau of ReclamationDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2018
- Cal. Coastkeeper Alliance v. Cal. State Lands Commission CA3California Court of Appeal · 2021
- California Coastkeeper Alliance v. State Lands CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
- California Renters Legal Advocacy and Education Fund v. City of San Mateo 9/10/2 Case Details Related Case: A159658California Court of Appeal · 2021
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.