Legal Opinion
Aptos Council v. County of Santa Cruz
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 30, 2017No. H042976PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PREMO, J.
Appellant Aptos Council challenges respondent County of Santa Cruz’s (County) adoption of three ordinances that (1) extended minor exceptions to zoning site standards, (2) altered certain height, density, and parking requirements for hotels in commercial districts, and (3) established an administrative process for approving minor exceptions to the County’s sign ordinance. Aptos Council argues the County engaged in piecemeal environmental review in violation of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Pub. Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.) 1 when it considered the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- No Oil, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Muzzy Ranch Co. v. Solano County Airport Land Use CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Bakersfield Citizens for Local Control v. City of BakersfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- W.S. v. S.T., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Agindotan v. Wells Fargo & Co. CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Citizens Coal. L. A. v. City of L. A., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Citizens Coalition Los Angeles v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
- Citizens Coalition Los Angeles v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.