Palvutzian v. Terkanian
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County. D. A. Cashin, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
From a judgment in favor of the defendants the plaintiff appeals. The suit was for damages and for injunction to prevent interference with certain irrigating ditches and the flow of water over the defendants' land for which the plaintiff claimed an easement.
The court found that prior to 1885 the predecessors of both the plaintiff and defendants owned in one body the lands now owned by them severally. While the lands were held in single ownership two irrigation ditches or canals were constructed across the tract. These ditches were connected with the main ditch or canal of the Fresno Canal and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Cave v. CraftsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
- Carpy v. DowdellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Chapman v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Rogers v. SchlotterbackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Cheda v. BodkinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Johnson v. SchimpfCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- People v. BatemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Silveira v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Rosebrook v. UtzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.