Legal Opinion
People v. Bateman
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 9, 1943No. Crim. 3662PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.
Prom judgments of guilty of violating section 337a, subdivision 3 of the Penal Code, after trial before the court without a jury, defendant appeals. There is also an appeal from the order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial.
The evidence being viewed in the light most favorable to the People (respondent), the essential facts are:
*586On May 18, 1942, Officer Boswell of the Los Angeles Police Department saw defendant enter a drug store at 300 South Hill Street. Officer Boswell walked to the doorway of the drug store and saw defendant standing before a counter, on the other side of which was…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- People v. NewlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Asher v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- People v. HinkleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- People v. PruittCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- People v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Paley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- United States v. Eduardo Borrone-IglarCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- Cochran v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Nichols v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1988
- People v. KleinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.