Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People Ex Rel. Brown v. iMERGENT, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 20, 2009No. B201302PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PERREN, J. —

Defendants, iMergent, Inc., and its subsidiary, StoresOnline, Inc., are self-described providers of “eCommerce” technology, training, and other Web-based programs that purport to help start, operate, and maintain home-based businesses. Recognizing the danger that such products and services present to unsophisticated purchasers, California enacted the Seller Assisted Marketing Plan (SAMP) Act (Civ. Code, § 1812.200 et seq.). Among other things, this legislation imposes a duty on the seller of SAMP’s to make certain disclosures to the Attorney General and the prospective…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Tobe v. City of Santa AnaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. People Ex Rel. Gallo v. AcunaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Bowland v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Williams v. GarcettiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Benson v. Kwikset Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Oiye v. FoxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  2. People v. J.W.California Court of Appeal · 2015
  3. Urs Corp. v. Venture, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  4. Ivory Educ. Inst. v. Dep't of Fish & Wildlife, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  5. Ivory Education Institute v. Dept. of Fish & WildlifeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API