Legal Opinion

People v. Ball

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 5, 1929No. Docket No. 1861PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHouser, J.

Defendant was convicted on each of two counts in an information wherein he was charged with the commission of the crime of forgery and a prior conviction of a charge of forgery, a felony. He appeals from the judgment and an order denying his motion for a new trial. Other than as to the second count in the information, no serious effort is made by appellant to show that prejudicial error was committed by the trial court on the trial of the action.

Appellant’s first contention is that the evidence adduced on the trial was insufficient to support the verdict. The evidence showed that the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. FrankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  2. People v. BarricCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  3. People v. Ah SamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
  4. People v. HughesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  5. People v. NelsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. JuehlingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  2. People v. WilliamsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  3. People v. HidalgoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  4. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1955
  5. People v. AdairCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API