Legal Opinion

People v. Juehling

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 7, 1935No. Crim. 2794PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHouser, P. J.

From each of two several judgments of conviction on as many separate charges of receiving stolen property that theretofore had been preferred against her, as well as from an order by which her motion for a new trial was denied, defendant has appealed to this court.

As developed by the evidence adduced on the trial of the action, it appears that as to count I of the information, on or about January 22, 1935, in circumstances unnecessary herein to be set forth, a watch that was contained in a lady’s handbag was stolen from an automobile at a time when it was being driven by its owner; and that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. MendezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. People v. JacobsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  3. People v. MercadoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  4. People v. AlboriCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  5. People v. HenryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. People v. HydeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. People v. KunkinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  3. People v. BoydenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  4. People v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  5. People v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API