Legal Opinion
People v. Williamson
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 1, 1933No. Docket No. 2334PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ARCHBALD, J., pro tem.
Appellant was accused by an information filed by the district attorney of the crime of forgery, in two counts, and also with three prior convictions of felony, one of which was afterwards withdrawn and the two remaining were admitted. He entered a plea of not guilty to the two counts of forgery. The jury found him not guilty as to count I, but guilty as to count II. From the judgment of conviction entered on said verdict and from the order denying his motion for a new trial he has appealed.
The evidence as to count II shows that on February 27, 1932, appellant went to the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Kring v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Linbeck v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1890
- People v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- People v. EppingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- State v. PavelichWashington Supreme Court · 1929
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- People v. Superior Court (Zamudio)California Supreme Court · 2000
- People v. PutnamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- People v. MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- People v. BowensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- People v. BRACCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.