Legal Opinion

People v. Hidalgo

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 16, 1933No. Docket No. 2267PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHouser, J.

On each of six separate counts of an information filed against him defendant was convicted of the crime of forgery. From the ensuing judgment, as well as from an order by which his motion for a new trial was denied, defendant appeals to this court.

In each count of the information the instrument alleged to have been forged and “passed” was a check on Seaboard National Bank of Los Angeles, purportedly drawn by “Baker Ice Machine Company, L. Baker, H. Spencer.” The. only variations that distinguished any one of such checks from either of the others were its serial number, its date, the amount…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. WhitemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. People v. MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Matthews v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. People v. ElliottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  5. People v. LundinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. HassenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  2. People v. CullenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  3. People v. MaioliCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  4. People v. LeonardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. Robinson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API