Legal Opinion

People v. Adair

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 24, 1934No. Crim. 2644PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCOTT, J., pro tem.

Defendant Adair was accused on one count of forgery and two counts of forgery of a fictitious name, after prior conviction of a felony. He admitted the former conviction and was convicted and sentenced on all three counts. From the judgment and order denying motion for new trial he appeals.

Intent to defraud is said to be lacking to support the jury’s verdicts. The check set out in count- 1 was drawn by appellant’s co-defendant Ainsworth, and cashed by Adair at a market where he was known by sight, the proceeds being used in part to settle an old account and the balance…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. EppingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. People v. GayleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  3. People v. BallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. People v. AresenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  3. People v. CrowderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. People v. MartinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. People v. ValdesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API