Plainsman Trading Co. v. Crews
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
CHAPA, Chief Justice.
This is an appeal from a trial court’s determination of the ownership of uranium underlying a certain tract of land in Duval County. The issues before this court are:
1) whether the trial court erred in submitting a jury charge allegedly containing numerous errors; and,
2) whether the surface destruction test governs the ownership of royalties from minerals that attach to the surface estate.
FACTS
Appellees, Thomas and Dorothy Crews, own the surface and one-half of the minerals underlying a tract of land composed of nearly 2000 acres. They sought a declaratory judgment of…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Texas Department of Human Services v. E.B.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
- Luckel v. WhiteTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Island Recreational Development Corp. v. Republic of Texas Savings Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1986
- Texaco, Inc. v. Pennzoil, Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1987
- Exxon Corp. v. PerezTexas Supreme Court · 1992
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Plainsman Trading Co. v. CrewsTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- Harris v. General Motors Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1996
- Plainsman Trading Co. v. CrewsTexas Supreme Court · 1995