Legal Opinion

Plainsman Trading Co. v. Crews

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 13, 1994No. 04-93-00583-CVPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHAPA, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from a trial court’s determination of the ownership of uranium underlying a certain tract of land in Duval County. The issues before this court are:

1) whether the trial court erred in submitting a jury charge allegedly containing numerous errors; and,

2) whether the surface destruction test governs the ownership of royalties from minerals that attach to the surface estate.

FACTS

Appellees, Thomas and Dorothy Crews, own the surface and one-half of the minerals underlying a tract of land composed of nearly 2000 acres. They sought a declaratory judgment of…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Texas Department of Human Services v. E.B.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Luckel v. WhiteTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Island Recreational Development Corp. v. Republic of Texas Savings Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Texaco, Inc. v. Pennzoil, Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1987
  5. Exxon Corp. v. PerezTexas Supreme Court · 1992

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Plainsman Trading Co. v. CrewsTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Harris v. General Motors Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1996
  3. Plainsman Trading Co. v. CrewsTexas Supreme Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API