Legal Opinion

Exxon Corp. v. Perez

Texas Supreme Court

Decided September 9, 1992No. D-1366PublishedCited by 172 opinions

1Per curiam

The Motion for Rehearing of Oscar Perez is overruled and the following is substituted as the court’s opinion.

We revisit the former Workers’ Compensation Act (the Act) to consider whether the trial court erred by refusing to include within the charge a question and accompanying definition on Oscar Perez’s status as Exxon’s borrowed servant. The court of appeals found no error and affirmed the trial court. We disagree.

This cause arises from a personal injury suit brought by Perez in 1987 against Exxon for injuries he sustained while cutting pipe for Exxon under the supervision of Exxon’s…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Island Recreational Development Corp. v. Republic of Texas Savings Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Newspapers, Inc. v. LoveTexas Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Producers Chemical Company v. McKayTexas Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. MartinTexas Supreme Court · 1949

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by172 opinions

  1. St. Joseph Hospital v. WolffTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Hyundai Motor Co. v. Rodriguez Ex Rel. RodriguezTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Triplex Communications, Inc. v. RileyTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Exxon Corp. v. TidwellTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Browning-Ferris Industries, Inc. v. LieckTexas Supreme Court · 1994

167 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API