Harris v. General Motors Corp.

OPINION

GREEN, Justice.

This is a products liability action. Harris appeals a take-nothing judgment rendered against her. The jury refused to find General Motors liable and returned a zero-damages finding. Harris complains the trial court erred because the jury instruction annexed to certain of the liability questions raised an inferential rebuttal issue and improperly commented on the weight of the evidence. We affirm.

Irma Harris was allegedly injured when her ear was struck from behind by another vehicle. Harris sued General Motors, among others, alleging design, manufacturing, and marketing…