Legal Opinion

Kelley v. Richardson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1888PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Error to Alpena. (Emerick, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts ¡are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

This case was first argued at the October term of 1887 before three Judges. But as a case involving the same questions was, early in the January term, 1888, argued before the full bench, it was thought proper to have the present case presented so as to be decided by the same Judges. It was therefore reargued, with some additional arguments and submitted for our final action.

Plaintiff recovered judgment below against defendant for $20,000 for services rendered her as executrix and sole legatee and devisee of her husband’s estate. These services were sought from him as an experienced attorney,…

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. Goodwin v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. FalveyIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Transportation Line v. HopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  4. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. WoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Reynolds v. . RobinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1876

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State Highway Commission v. ArnoldOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Healy v. Visalia & Tulare R.R.California Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Mellon v. FultonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  4. People v. ZimmermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Eesley Light & Power Co. v. Commonwealth Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1912

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API