Legal Opinion

State Highway Commission v. Arnold

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1959PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.

The plaintiff brought an action to acquire by condemnation the defendants’ interest in 21.52 acres of land located in Klamath County. Prom a verdict and judgment for $13,250 the plaintiff appeals.

The defendants’ interest in the property involved consisted of a leasehold interest in the surface and the mineral rights. The plaintiff had previously acquired the fee subject to the foregoing interests.

The property taken includes one-third of a cinder cone, described as “Buckeye Butte,” which is a geological formation of volcanic origin made up of a mineral aggregate useful for certain construction…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Olson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Boom Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  3. United States v. CorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Montana Railway Co. v. WarrenSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  5. George v. Bekins Van & Storage Co.California Supreme Court · 1949

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. State v. RogersOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Myers v. Cessna Aircraft CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Dept. of Trans. v. LundbergOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. DeGregorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  5. State Highway Commission v. ConradSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API