State Highway Commission v. Arnold
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.
The plaintiff brought an action to acquire by condemnation the defendants’ interest in 21.52 acres of land located in Klamath County. Prom a verdict and judgment for $13,250 the plaintiff appeals.
The defendants’ interest in the property involved consisted of a leasehold interest in the surface and the mineral rights. The plaintiff had previously acquired the fee subject to the foregoing interests.
The property taken includes one-third of a cinder cone, described as “Buckeye Butte,” which is a geological formation of volcanic origin made up of a mineral aggregate useful for certain construction…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Olson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Boom Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- United States v. CorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Montana Railway Co. v. WarrenSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- George v. Bekins Van & Storage Co.California Supreme Court · 1949
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- State v. RogersOregon Supreme Court · 2000
- Myers v. Cessna Aircraft CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- Dept. of Trans. v. LundbergOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. DeGregorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- State Highway Commission v. ConradSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.